Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Default Soldier/token deck help

    sorry for that first post, anyway here is the real deck I am trying to build. Any thoughts or suggestions are greatly appreciated!

    3x Mother Of Runes
    3x Gideon's Lawkeeper
    2x Intangible Virtue
    2x Dawn Charm
    3x Raise The Alarm
    3x Grand Abolisher
    3x Mobilization
    3x Field Marshal
    3x Oblivion Ring
    3x Hero Of Bladehold
    3x Captain's Call
    2x Odric, Master Tactician
    2x Elspeth Tirel
    1x Captain Of The Watch

    8x Plains
    4x Rupture Spire
    4x Sunpetal Grove
    4x Daru Encampment
    4x Gavony Township
    Last edited by titan28; 07-22-2012 at 02:34 PM.

  2. #2
    Card Flipper fishboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    In the Ęther
    Posts
    76

    Default

    I would get rid of Captain of the Watch. I don't think it is worth the 6 mana. If you already have Mobilization or Intangible Virtue out, your soldiers will already have Vigilance. The daru encampments only give one soldier +1/+1, so i would get rid of them, and maybe put some forests in and go more white/green. If you put the forests in, you could add in some doubling seasons and Parallel Lives. You might consider Darien, King of Kjeldor. If you don't want to add any forests, and want to keep Captain of the Watch you could some Stormfront Riders and attended knights and Remove Raise the Alarm and Captain's Call. you can use Stormfront Riders to return attended knights, Captain of the Watch and other Stormfront Riders to your hand. to decrease the cost to keep up this cycle, throw in some daru warchiefs and ballyrush bannerets.

  3. #3

    Default

    id try using cheaper creatures like Elite Vanguard, Thraben Valiant, and Glory Seeker
    Last edited by napoleon; 08-10-2012 at 10:36 AM.

  4. #4
    Card Flipper fishboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    In the Ęther
    Posts
    76

    Default

    It would be pointless to add low drop creatures, since you will be filling the battlefield with tokens. Once you get decently into the game, every turn you draw a weak creature and play it with plenty of unused mana.

  5. #5

    Default

    But the faster you can get started and overwhelm your opponent the faster youll win

  6. #6
    Last edited by napoleon; 08-12-2012 at 01:30 PM.

  7. #7
    Card Flipper fishboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    In the Ęther
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by napoleon View Post
    But the faster you can get started and overwhelm your opponent the faster youll win
    The faster you get started, the faster you have the opportunity to win. However, you are not seizing that opportunity by filling your deck with low-cost weak creatures. After you have played all of the cards from your original hand, every turn, you will be getting out one weak creature, when if you kept a balance of cards, you could get several of those out by playing, say, Captain of the Watch, or Stormfront Riders, or attacking with Hero of Bladehold. He has enough low-drop creatures for early game.

  8. #8

    Default

    But by then I have Odric out and can dictate combat and swing for a lot

  9. #9
    Card Flipper fishboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    In the Ęther
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Why swing for a lot when you can swing for a metric **** ton?

  10. #10
    Power Player Nick 30075's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Virginia Tech
    Posts
    3,407

    Default

    My most successful creature-based deck is my Tempered Steel list. And I only have 7 cards (4 Tempered Steel and 3 Master of Etherium) that cost 3 mana. Everything else is cheap. The goal is to play out your hand and hit them for 20 the turn before they stabilize. If you have cards in your hand, you're doing it wrong because that's one more creature that could be beating for 2 per turn.

    It's a very aggressive all-in style.

    At the same time, my old favorite deck had no creatures (except for a 3/2 regenerator) that costed below 3 and it was still an aggro deck--and it was rather successful at it. The style was based on landing 3-4 creatures and backing them up with burn and removal.

    Both styles are valid. It's just up to the player which is better.

    I play a lot of RDW, so I'm used to having a small hand. My personal preference (and nothing more) is to the deck that has a lot of low-cost creatures and dumps them out really quickly. There's something special about that look on an opponent's face when you land 4 creatures alongside your first land.
    Quote Originally Posted by reydar View Post
    ornithopter FLIES. IT FLIIIEEEEEESSSS MAN. ITS GOT WINGS AND SH*T AND IT FLIESSSSSSSSSSS. DOUBLE RAINBOW AWESOME
    Casual:
    Red Deck Wins

    Modern on Cockatrice:
    GW Humans

    Legacy on Cockatrice:
    Red Burn

    EDH/Commander:
    Tariel Trololol, Teneb HerpDerp, Mimeoplasm OmNom, Riku of Copyright Infringement

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All original content herein is Copyright 2000-2012 Ascension Gaming Network, Inc.
No portion of this web site may be used in any way without expressed written consent.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy