|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Top 8 Master
-
Power Player
This is probably too good for 4 mana. Creatureless control decks would love this, and imagine if you had multiples out... Also, it's quite anti-synergetic as your 1/1 creature tokens pretty much die immediately, only to be replaced by themselves... Which makes me think, you should probably only get creature tokens from non-token creatures, otherwise this will get ridiculous from effects that trigger from creatures entering and leaving the battlefield.
-
-
Power Player
Hm, if you don't want to make it more expensive, I could see making it non-artifact creature to slightly narrow it down a bit. Fits flavor wise, robots rarely get the flu
-
Power Player
...Contagion is too good. Give them wither, or even more balance-oriented, just make 'em no-ability.
Is now using Dragon speech recognition software. It is very sweet.
 : Target creature gains haste.
-
Top 8 Master
 Originally Posted by S3ptic
Hm, if you don't want to make it more expensive, I could see making it non-artifact creature to slightly narrow it down a bit. Fits flavor wise, robots rarely get the flu 
Done
 Originally Posted by Magus Jr
... Contagion is too good. Give them wither, or even more balance-oriented, just make 'em no-ability.
and done.
“I'm the non-technical, right-brained, intuitive creative guy so I felt it only fair to explain my terminology...” – Mark Rosewater
-
Top-decker
Maybe would be better at 5 mana. Just because I don't want goblins and aggro decks to scoop on turn 4. It is basically a reoccurring wrath unless their creatures have haste, and if not, well then you probably just played a bunch of 1/1s. More colors have answers to a creature. It is a good flavorful idea, just has to be tweaked.
-
Power Player
This is way too good. It even generates all the chump blockers you need. It almost completely shuts down aggro. It's almost Moat and Wrath of God rolled into one.
 Originally Posted by guyarney
...but not with an endless supply of 1/1s.
-
Top-decker
Just if you want to put a limitation why don't you put not-black creatures so you can avoid non germ as well. Germs are black right? So you ll have less wording and it makes more sense that your black magic can not affect so much black creatures?
-
Top 8 Master
 Originally Posted by krako
Just if you want to put a limitation why don't you put not-black creatures so you can avoid non germ as well. Germs are black right? So you ll have less wording and it makes more sense that your black magic can not affect so much black creatures?
I think WotC made a small flavor mistake in making Germs black. I see them as unaligned, color neutral, germs.
“I'm the non-technical, right-brained, intuitive creative guy so I felt it only fair to explain my terminology...” – Mark Rosewater
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All original content herein is Copyright 2000-2012 Ascension Gaming Network,
Inc.
No portion of this web site may be used in any way without expressed written consent.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|