|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Top-decker
-
Power Player
Wouldn't it read 'Prevent all damage dealt by creatures without Vigilance.'?
-
Top-decker
 Originally Posted by Magus Jr
Wouldn't it read 'Prevent all damage dealt by creatures without Vigilance.'?
Thanks for your feedback. Well, that's not exactly the same in fact. You suggest changing the effect to a damage prevention, that could be bypassed by a card like Flaring Pain or Excruciator. Why not. However I dislike turning "tapped creature" into "creature without vigilance". It doesn't have the "same taste"
-
Power Player
Plus with the current wording, you can't do combat shenanigans by tapping a creature while it's blocking to do some effect. Otherwise the creature blocking will deal no damage.
Rules advisor: 11/1/11
 Originally Posted by Sinders
listen to fallen.
<winky smiley face>
Standard: U/G "Dredge"
Legacy: Dream Halls
-
Power Player
Awesome design, love it!
Usually I have at least one suggestion, but this thing seems perfect as-is. Great flavor, feels very white and angelic, and seems fairly costed as well.
-
Top-decker
I like it but there are a few flaws
-
Top-decker
-
Top-decker
Whats the point of saying tapped creatures deal no combat damage?
-
Power Player
It messes with combat shennanigans. I can't block and tap in response and still have my creature Deal Damage.
Rules advisor: 11/1/11
 Originally Posted by Sinders
listen to fallen.
<winky smiley face>
Standard: U/G "Dredge"
Legacy: Dream Halls
-
Top-decker
Ok then I guess so but wouldn't damage be dealt before it taps or does it tap as it blocks
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All original content herein is Copyright 2000-2012 Ascension Gaming Network,
Inc.
No portion of this web site may be used in any way without expressed written consent.
All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy
|
|
|
|
|