CardOfTheHeart
09-05-2006, 06:54 AM
This has been nagging me for a while, and I just found out that I STILL can't post to the UDE Judge List despite the fact that I'm a LV1 Judge and subscribed to the list. (I may have to send Ian a message about this, later.)
So, I'll bring this up, here.
Now this concerns "Demise, King of Armageddon" and "Levia-Dragon - Daedalus."
Levia-Dragon - Daedalus
By sending "Umi" on your side of the field to the Graveyard, destroy all cards on the field except this card.
Demise, King of Armageddon
This card can only be Ritual Summoned with the Ritual Spell Card, "End of the World". By paying 2000 Life Points, destroy all cards on the field except this card.
Note that I've underlined the common phrase in the two effect texts, which is part of the reason why I believe there is a conflict of rules in these two cards.
First off, look at this Levia ruling:
When "Book of Moon" is chained to "Levia-Dragon Daedalus"' effect to flip it face-down, the effect still resolves, but "Levia-Dragon Daedalus" is destroyed by its own effect, since it's no longer "this card", it's just "a card".
Now let's look at this Demise ruling:
If an effect is chained to "Demise's" effect to flip "Demise, King of Armageddon" face-down, he is still not destroyed by his effect.
Okay, so one monster is destroyed by its own effect when flipped face-down, but the other is not. Am I the only one that thinks this is a problem?
Think about it. The costs to activate the effects are different, but the effects are EXACTLY THE SAME.
You can't say there's something special about Demise's effect that protects itself when flipped face-down; it's the same effect as Levia-Dragon.
You can't really say that their costs have anything to do with this.
'One card makes you lose a card, but the other makes you lose Life Points; so we (UDE) better make sure that the Life-Point investment is protected more than the single-card investment.' Seriously?
o_O
Give me a break.
:confused:
So, can someone explain this to me?
So, I'll bring this up, here.
Now this concerns "Demise, King of Armageddon" and "Levia-Dragon - Daedalus."
Levia-Dragon - Daedalus
By sending "Umi" on your side of the field to the Graveyard, destroy all cards on the field except this card.
Demise, King of Armageddon
This card can only be Ritual Summoned with the Ritual Spell Card, "End of the World". By paying 2000 Life Points, destroy all cards on the field except this card.
Note that I've underlined the common phrase in the two effect texts, which is part of the reason why I believe there is a conflict of rules in these two cards.
First off, look at this Levia ruling:
When "Book of Moon" is chained to "Levia-Dragon Daedalus"' effect to flip it face-down, the effect still resolves, but "Levia-Dragon Daedalus" is destroyed by its own effect, since it's no longer "this card", it's just "a card".
Now let's look at this Demise ruling:
If an effect is chained to "Demise's" effect to flip "Demise, King of Armageddon" face-down, he is still not destroyed by his effect.
Okay, so one monster is destroyed by its own effect when flipped face-down, but the other is not. Am I the only one that thinks this is a problem?
Think about it. The costs to activate the effects are different, but the effects are EXACTLY THE SAME.
You can't say there's something special about Demise's effect that protects itself when flipped face-down; it's the same effect as Levia-Dragon.
You can't really say that their costs have anything to do with this.
'One card makes you lose a card, but the other makes you lose Life Points; so we (UDE) better make sure that the Life-Point investment is protected more than the single-card investment.' Seriously?
o_O
Give me a break.
:confused:
So, can someone explain this to me?